Navigation menu

Calls, emails, and texts — our most intimate moments. They CAN vacuum up an entire neighbourhood, or the private data of up to 10, people at once.

It's a rare look into the pricing and packaging of the cellphone surveillance tech.

Read the full petition here. We are calling on law-makers around the world to implement safeguards protecting innocent individuals from invasive cell phone surveillance from Stingrays also known as IMSI-catchers. Law enforcement agencies around the world are increasingly using Stingray technologies to engage in secret, invasive, mass surveillance of cell phone data. We need strong, genuinely transparent, and properly enforced protections to secure privacy rights in an age of ubiquitous mobile phone technology. The use of Stingrays should comply with the Necessary and Proportionate International Principles on the Application of Human Rights to Communications Surveillance, and should respect our reasonable expectation of privacy, as protected under Article 12 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

Find our respective privacy policies here , here , here , here and here. Law enforcement agencies are increasingly using Stingray technologies for invasive and irresponsible surveillance of the most intimate personal information found on your cell phone — without your knowledge. We need to take action. We demand oversight, accountability, and judicial safeguards to ensure our right to privacy is respected.


  1. mobile spy iphone 7 vs galaxy note 8?
  2. free cell phone keylogger.
  3. Stingray cell phone surveillance devices may interfere with calls, senator says – TechCrunch.
  4. spy sms messages online.
  5. FlexiSPY Works On All Devices;
  6. spy iphone 6 without software.

We have a right to our privacy and security. When governments violate these rights, our most basic intimate moments are violated, and our safety, security and trust are all put in jeopardy. Stop Stingrays from invading your cell phone. Police scoop up data on thousands in mobile phone 'tower dumps' to track down criminals. Source: Sydney Morning Herald. Special investigation: Bugged, tracked, hacked. Source: Channel 9. Spyware for sale: Hacking Team leaks show Australian companies scrambling to cash in on Government surveillance contracts.

Source: ABC.

Stingray phone tracker

Someone is spying on cell phones in the nation's capital. Source: CBC News. Canada's national police force officially confirms ownership, use of Stingray devices. Source: Techdirt. Government use of surveillance devices must be restricted: privacy experts. Source: Globe and Mail. Source: Toronto Star. Surveillance device used in prison sets off police probe. RCMP fight to keep lid on high-tech investigation tool.

The Friday Cover

Vancouver police refuse to disclose use of covert cell spy tech. Source: Global News. Are StingRay cellphone surveillance systems used by Vancouver police? Source: CBC. France has adopted in July the possibility for the intelligence services to use IMSI Catchers with a very weak oversight. Source: Recode. Source: Privacy International. The Miami-Dade Police Department apparently first purchased a cell-site simulator in to surveil protestors at a Free Trade of the Americas Agreement conference. A recent Congressional Oversight Committee report called on Congress to pass laws requiring a warrant before using cell-site simulators.

Some states, such as California , already require a warrant, except in emergency situations. Harris Corporation is the most prevalent company providing cell-site simulators to law enforcement. Their Stingray product has become the catchphrase for these devices, but they have subsequently introduced other models, such as Hailstorm, ArrowHead , AmberJack, and KingFish. The Intercept published a secret, internal U. Cell-site simulators invade the privacy of everyone who happens to be in a given area, regardless of the fact that the vast majority have not been accused of committing a crime.

The use of cell-site simulators have been shrouded in government secrecy. For a while, police departments tried to keep the use of cell-site simulators secret from not just the public but also the court system, withholding information from defense attorneys and judges—likely due to non-disclosure agreements with Harris Corporation.

Prosecutors have accepted plea deals to hide their use of cell-site simulators and have even dropped cases rather than revealing information about their use of the technology. Marshalls have driven files hundreds of miles to thwart public records requests. Louis, Missouri. In light of this secrecy, the FBI told police officers to recreate evidence from the devices, according to a document obtained by the nonprofit investigative journalism outlet Oklahoma Watch. Cell-site simulators have been shown to disproportionately affect low-income communities and communities of color.

Cell-site simulators rely on a vulnerability in our communications system that the government should help fix rather than exploit. For the reasons above, EFF opposes police use of cell site simulators. Insofar as law enforcement agencies are using cell-site simulators in criminal investigations, EFF argues that use should be limited in the following ways:.

We filed a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit to expose and shine light on the U. Along with the ACLU and ACLU of Maryland, we filed an amicus brief in the first case in the country where a judge threw out evidence obtained as a result of using a cell-site simulator without a warrant. We filed an amicus brief, along with the ACLU, pointing a court to facts indicating that the Milwaukee Police Department secretly used a cell-site simulator to locate a defendant through his cell phone without a warrant in U. Damian Patrick. The government then admitted to having used it.

This bill requires California police to get a warrant before using a cell-site simulator. Any evidence obtained from a cell-site simulator without a warrant is inadmissible in court. EFF supported S.

We are in the process of collecting these policies. We are currently doing further research on the technical aspects of cell-site simulators. State of Maryland v. Kerron Andrews. EFF v. Department of Justice. Join EFF Lists. Electronic Frontier Foundation. What Kinds of Data Cell-Site Simulators Collect Data collected by cell-site simulators can reveal intensely personal information about anyone who carries a phone, whether or not they have ever been suspected of a crime. Who Sells Cell-site Simulators Harris Corporation is the most prevalent company providing cell-site simulators to law enforcement.


  • More from POLITICO Magazine;
  • The Friday Cover.
  • 1. MMGuardian.
  • phone tracker free app.
  • Insofar as law enforcement agencies are using cell-site simulators in criminal investigations, EFF argues that use should be limited in the following ways: Law enforcement should obtain individualized warrants based on probable cause; Cell-site simulators should only be used for serious, violent crimes; Cell-site simulators should only be used for identifying location; Law enforcement must minimize the collection of data from people who are not the targets of the investigation.

    Kerron Andrews U.

    Remotely Monitor Cell Phones and Computers with Mobistealth

    Damian Patrick EFF v. Related Updates. EFF continues our fight to have the U.